Our Block

Our Block
Aerial View

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Help on the way?

Emanuel May Put More Cops in High-Crime Areas

Mayor Rahm Emanuel defended the Chicago Police Department’s deployment of officers Thursday but, without offering details of his plans, promised to consider concentrating more police personnel in neighborhoods plagued by violence.
“I’m not done … in looking to see if we need to put more officers where we have a crime problem,” the mayor said. “We have applied more resources to the areas that need them and we are not done.”
Emanuel’s comments came less than a week after the Chicago News Cooperative reported on previously secret assignment data for more than 10,000 sworn police department employees. The CNC’s analysis of the data showed that some relatively safe police districts have as many officers assigned to patrol them as areas with much higher rates of murder, rapes and other violent crimes.
Many of the districts with the highest rates of crimes per beat officer are on the South and West Sides, the CNC found.
The American Civil Liberties Union cited the CNC’s reporting extensively in a civil rights lawsuit against the city that it filed Thursday. The suit, filed in Cook County Circuit Court, alleges that “the city’s deployment practices have a disproportionately adverse effect on people who live in minority neighborhoods.”
The ACLU suit also alleged that the police more frequently were delayed in responding to 911 calls in black and Hispanic neighborhoods than in predominantly white sections of Chicago. The Sun-Times reported last year that police districts on the North Side would lose beat officers to South Side and West Side districts if the city redeployed personnel based on the volume of 911 calls and backups for police service.
Since his inauguration in May, Emanuel said, he has redeployed 1,019 officers from desk jobs or specialized units to assignments “on the streets,” with an emphasis on boosting the number of beat officers in higher-crime districts.
“I understand that they brought the lawsuit, but, look, we are ahead of where we were on May 15,” Emanuel said, referring to the day before his swearing-in ceremony. “We’re not done applying our resources, be they both by holding commanders accountable or applying manpower.”
Emanuel did not offer details of how he might juggle the department’s use of its resources. But as a candidate and as mayor, he has rejected the notion of taking officers from safer districts, as many black aldermen long have sought.
And Emanuel has acknowledged that he would have fewer officers to shift around the city than in the past. The ranks of the police department have declined markedly in recent years, with attrition far outpacing hiring. Facing a budget deficit, Emanuel has proposed erasing more than 1,200 vacancies that have remained unfilled from the city’s budget books in 2012.
In their suit, ACLU officials said the deployment data obtained by the CNC reflects that Emanuel has not done nearly enough yet.
“Redeployment has not ameliorated the disparity between minority and white districts in the proportion of officers assigned to the districts, as measured by the number of violent crimes,” according to the suit, whose plaintiffs also included the Central Austin Neighborhood Association.
The CNC obtained deployment data from an anonymous police source. City officials have continued to decline to make the data public, saying its release would constitute a security risk.
Harvey Grossman, the legal director for the ACLU, said the lawsuit is an attempt to “bring sunshine” to the deployment of officers by forcing the city to explain its assignment strategy.
“This shouldn’t be a secret in the city,” he said. “We pay for those services. Everybody agrees that public perception is an incredibly important part of public safety. You can’t have a sense of safety if you don’t know how your officers are deployed.”
Serethea Reid, the president of the Central Austin Neighborhood Association, said many of her neighbors do not call the city’s 911 center because they doubt officers will show up.
“It is time to make response time equal across the city,” she said. “I’m sad every time that I read stories or hear comments about this issue where it’s described as taking police away from some other neighborhood.”
Some aldermen say they will grill Emanuel’s police superintendent, Garry McCarthy, on the subject of deployment when he appears this afternoon at a City Council budget hearing on the police department’s proposed 2012 budget.

Speaking of Winter: Clear your snow or risk a fine.

Sidenote:  This has always been the case in Chicago.  However in an era of revenue deficiencies - the DOR will be enforcing this and many other policies in the years to come.

 

Failure to shovel snow from your sidewalk could prove costly



Last Modified: Oct 27, 2011 02:11AM

Chicagoans who neglect to shovel their snow-covered sidewalks this winter could be in for a big surprise — a warning notice, followed by a ticket — if an influential alderman has his way.

After watching the Department of Streets and Sanitation showcase its “mobile electronic ticketing,” Ald. Tom Tunney (44th), chairman of the City Council’s Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development, suggested Wednesday that the Blackberry technology be used to crack down on a chronic winter violation that endangers and infuriates pedestrians.

“One thing I know is not being written is people who don’t shovel their snow. I’m assuming that this technology is there to take a picture of the snow not being shoveled [and say], ‘Property owner, here’s your $100 ticket.’ Is that correct?” Tunney asked a Streets and San employee doing the demonstration.

“That’s correct,” the employee said.

Streets and Sanitation Commissioner Tom Byrne added, “You can go that way. We haven’t gotten there yet. The sky’s the limit on it. We can do almost anything with it.”

Homeowners and businesses are required by law to shovel the sidewalks in front of their property, but the ordinance is rarely enforced. Tickets range from $50 to $100.

Tunney said he’s dead serious about cracking down on snow shoveling neglect, but only after giving property owners “one or two” warnings.

“The complaint we have when we go to community meetings is, ‘Who owns that property? We’re trying to walk down the street, and everybody seems to be doing a good job except one or two property owners.’ A ticket here or there [and], all the sudden, the snow will be removed on a timely basis,” he said.

“We need to use some street smarts before we go up and down the block trying to ticket. That’s not necessarily good for business. It’s not good for residents. It’s not good for politics. But at a point, we need people to abide by the municipal code.”

Ald. Leslie Hairston (5th) said any crackdown should target businesses — not homeowners.

“I don’t think we need to be patrolling citizens who do not shovel their sidewalks. Some of them may not be able to,” she said.

In the past, Chicago’s 50 ward superintendents hand- wrote tickets for an array of violations using a paper driven system and hand-held cameras.

Pictures of the violation were stapled together with the ticket and the court complaint, then shipped off to the Law Department for a title search to determine who owns the property. The file was then sent to the Department of Administrative hearings.

Now that all 50 ward superintendents have Blackberries, the system has gone paperless.

If a ward superintendent sees a vacant lot with high weeds, he or she snaps a picture of it with the Blackberry, types in an electronic ticket and e-mails the electronic file to the Law Department, where the ticket is cleared and sent to Administrative Hearings.

“We’re not doing title searches anymore. We’re not doing any type of real documentation on a lot. The GPS coordinates tell you the true coordinate, which saves a whole lot of time,” Byrne said.

The proposal to get tough on Chicagoans who fail to shovel their sidewalks comes at a time when crackdowns are also pending against disabled parking fraud, owners of unlicensed dogs and motorists who speed down residential streets near schools and parks.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Home Values by Zip Code: Crain's Chicago Business




Home Values By Zip Code


Enclosed is a unique link to a graphic that looks at Home Values in the Chicago Area.

To access the site visit the link below:

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20111013/PAGES/111019967